Those are good questions, but the reality is that the government has had a mechanism for transfer for years, and has had principles around that for years. Back in the 1990s, those principles were reiterated very clearly that they enter into a buying-up of existing access. It would also include a transfer to first nations in order to make sure that the Canadian government, the Canadian people, was paying for reconciliation, and not individual businesses or enterprises, which would be unfair to those enterprises.
When the court case came about, the lawyers for the first nations were very clear in saying that there's a win here for their ability to catch fish, but they have to work within the framework of transferring properly from the existing resource to their fishery. They've been doing that to some degree, but in some instances, with chinook, the federal government in fact has transferred 5,000 chinook from the area G troll fishery without the requisite buying-up of the area G licences that justify that, which is exactly what they've done with the commercial sport fishery here in B.C.
When you do that, you undermine the existing fisheries of people who've had 40 or 50 years of capital, social, and financial engagement in a fishery. They've just ripped their livelihood away from them with no compensation. The need to do it properly is really critical, and because it's a court-appointed fishery, the Canadian government has to make sure that it actually satisfies the needs that were recognized by that court case.