Whether or not we get approval from the whips or from the various parties or whether that determination is made is not necessarily a driving factor for this committee. We are masters of our own destiny here.
I think travelling to the west coast should obviously be part of this. It's actually critical. The whole point of my moving the motion in the first place is so we can go out and consult with those people who were impacted, who by and large felt—as my colleague just said to me—completely out of the loop. They were not consulted and did not have any adequate explanation as to why their livelihoods suffered the way they did in the 2019 season, a season in which, by the way, anybody who is a recreational fisherman would tell you was one of the best for catching chinook salmon in a long time, depending on where you were.
I don't know why this wouldn't be there. I've been here for 14 years. I've passed numerous motions at committees that have required or asked for travel, and I don't see why this one would be any different.