I've been away from it for about two years, but there was monitoring up to five years or maybe 10 years, I think. We said that the impacts related to the crossings needed to be measured 20 years or longer—or continuously. We used the Jasper, Alberta leg as an example. That had been done—I don't know—10 years earlier. The mitigation trees and shrubs were, like, that big. Most of them died. It still was problematic. The companies would say that they basically got this all signed off because they did what the government told them to do, but I don't think it was sufficient.
It goes back to my earlier talk. Capacity and understanding what constitutes habitat and how to repair it is still a really big issue. It loops back to the Trans Mountain pipeline project.