I agree. It should be on Minister Jordan, and it's disappointing that the fishers were pointing the blame at the indigenous fishers. They should have been pointing the finger at Minister Jordan. It falls at the government's feet. They have continually sent negotiators to the table without a mandate. They've dragged their feet in supporting the nation so that it can assert its right.
The Sipekne'katik are asserting their constitutional right to self-governance rights and the implementation of a lobster fishery management plan, which is their plan, and they are implementing it. It's currently discussing it with Canada, on the invitation on a nation-to-nation basis, which is the right form in terms of where that conversation is held.
Do you support that this current study of the standing committee must not undermine any discussions that the nation is currently having and engaged in with Canada?