Okay.
I'm not sure if you were listening to the comments from Professor Metallic, who presents herself as an expert witness on first nations treaty law. She indicated that in the transfer of fishing rights to the commercial, which was done by DFO, there seems to be a difference of opinion that maybe this process should never have been involved and that it should have gone directly to defining “moderate” and proceeding down that particular route.
What would your comments be on that? Is it one or the other, or is it a combination?