I'll go back to your comment that it would be problematic. Therefore, if DFO were to remove the fishing licence, access to the fishery that occurred, would it not have any negative impact on the continued negotiations on moderate? Could DFO remove those? The only part was moderate livelihood. There was no onus on the court decision to do that. The onus was on allowing a moderate livelihood. Would I be correct in assuming that those licences could be removed from the equation?
