Thank you very much, Madam Gill, for the questions.
First of all, I'd like to say that over the past 21 years, since Marshall, there has been a lot of work done to implement the Marshall decision, to work to make sure that first nations have access to the fishery. There have been a number of investments made to make sure that there has been access through licences, through boats, through training and through gear, so that first nations communities do have an ability to fish.
I will say that in 1999 the landing value for the first nations fishery was about $3 million. Last year that landing value was $120 million, so there has been progress made to making sure that first nations have access to the fishery.
With regard to the definition of a moderate livelihood, I think the big thing here to remember is that we've built systems as governments throughout history that did not include the Mi'kmaq or first nations in those systems. We need to make sure that what we're doing now is allowing the first nations to define the moderate livelihood for themselves. This can't be a top-down approach from government. This has to be something that comes directly from the Mi'kmaq. Although everyone seems to think it would be a much easier solution if the government just had a definition and then put everybody in place, I don't believe that's the best way forward.