On the Canadian side of things, there's a lot of recognition of a lot of the challenges. I think even in Washington and Oregon, with both the panellists and commissioners, there's a recognition that there are lots of problems. Alaska is more resistant to any change.
The reason I say this is because there's currently a review of the Pacific Salmon Treaty being done by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation within the treaty. It's assessing these sorts of things, although it isn't clear whether its mandate will actually get at the heart of whether the treaty is actually meeting the principles set out in the treaty, i.e., making sure we're not overfishing each other's populations and that we're getting the benefits from our own populations.
I think that review would need to be revised to really assess whether each chapter is meeting the objectives set out in the treaty and then, from there, to recommend much stronger mechanisms to actually revise the treaty based on the current environmental challenges our salmon are facing and the efforts we're putting into rebuilding these populations.