Yes, I can answer that.
If we're talking about Alaskan fisheries that are intercepting British Columbia stocks, they are collecting some information. They're doing DNA analysis on the sockeye that they're catching, but they don't provide us with population-level information. They only provide an aggregate of Skeena populations, for example.
For chinook salmon, they're collecting DNA and it's pretty good. For chum salmon—which I mentioned are in extremely low levels; they're an extreme conservation concern—they're collecting no information and they could be doing DNA analysis.
For coho populations, they could be collecting DNA, but they're not. For steelhead, they're collecting no DNA and they're also not collecting any information on how many steelhead are being caught and released, or are dying.
For pink salmon, they're not providing any information on how many B.C. pink salmon are being caught.
It's poor. Then on—