Yes. Maybe the most effective way is if we send his statement to you and you can read it.
In essence, he's saying that we're in a new world with climate change. Populations are crashing. The treaty is no longer the framework with which to deal with the problem of Alaska continuing to intercept Canadian fish.
He does not necessarily point to what the answer is, he just argues that we have to look at alternatives to deal with this issue, rather than just the treaty. It's not to say the treaty is not part of the solution, but we're not going to move past Alaska within the context of the treaty. Canada has to stand up and look at alternatives.