Okay.
First of all, I want to thank the witnesses.
I also want to thank this committee for undertaking this very critical work. It's very likely that but for the work of this committee, we would see $5 billion go to do exactly what these witnesses have urged us not to let happen—fish-killing pumps and new barriers to fish that cause more trouble—so I'm very grateful.
I want to turn my question to Tyrone McNeil from the Coquihalla for his very significant evidence. In particular, I want to ask him if is aware of what I found out only a couple of years ago, that when pipelines are being built, there's an existing memorandum of understanding that says the Department of Fisheries and Oceans delegates all of its responsibility for protecting fish habitat to what used to be called the National Energy Board and now the new version of that.
To the territory of the Coquihalla, and to Tyrone, do you see DFO on the ground protecting fish habitat as the pipeline is being constructed in normal times, and especially when we've had a significant flood event such as the one we had in November?