Madame Desbiens, I'll do my best to answer your question. I apologize. I was on the wrong toggle when you first started, so I only got the back half of your question in translation. I take it that it was about communication and how the $5 billion would be invested—using this as an example for other situations that could occur nationally.
I would say that the example of the B.C. floods really illustrates the challenge of planning, responding and investing in things that relate to flooding, which is a multi-jurisdictional and very complicated issue in the Canadian construct.
There is no easy solution. It's not like you can just point to one entity and say, “Over there, it's them. They should do it. They can fix everything.” There are indigenous rights that need to be considered. There are provincial authorities. There are federal authorities. There are local government authorities.
One important thing the federal government can do—because a lot of money comes from federal government sources to support flood planning, flood response and flood recovery—is to provide leadership and a guiding framework to help steer those investments towards things that could be what I'll call “smart”, in terms of future vision, and to find a better balance in supporting our people, our economy and our natural resources.