What I would say is that the two main gaps that we're trying to fill right now in the wrecked, abandoned and hazardous vessels national strategy are the two regulatory pieces that are to come. We spoke about putting in place the act; that's been done. We've talked about the national vessel inventory and the risk methodology; that's under way. We've talked about short-term funding to start getting vessels out of the water; that is under way.
Where we are now is those vessel owner improvements, which my colleague was speaking to a few moments ago, to bring down that period of time so that we'll have more accurate information as to who the owners are. Then, once we have that piece in place, we're able to build this vessel remediation fund, which is part of the act and is going to allow us to have a stable funding base with owners contributing to this fund through a regulatory charge each time they license their pleasure craft or register their vessel in the vessel registry. We'll be in a position to have a regulatory charge so that those folks are contributing to vessel remediations but also to some of the more proactive pieces that we've been talking about, like, for example, public education, research and development, local capacity building or even vessel turn-in programs. Those are really the gaps that we're trying to work through in the system to actually give effect to the vision of this strategy, which is still in the process of being rolled out.
I'll pass it to my Coast Guard colleague for the second part.