I apologize, my connection dropped off, but I caught most of your question. I'm having some Internet connection problems.
In response, I think when we enter into free trade negotiations with a partner, we absolutely assess what's possible before we get to the negotiating table. That's part of our due diligence, to assess what kind of agreement is possible at various negotiating tables, including some of the ones you mentioned, whether it's under the environment or writ large under market access. Certainly we look at a number of different issues and then when we sit down at the table with our counterparts, it's very much the case that we'll look at areas of commonality, look at areas where we can move forward together. I'm thinking specifically of the CETA, the Canada-European Union economic agreement, where we do have common objectives and we were able to achieve them in a number of different areas, whether it was the environment, or labour, etc.
Before we would negotiate with anyone, we would ideally like to have a common set of objectives, for sure.