I believe so. I wasn't at the table 30 years ago when it was last managed by NAFO. Certainly, however, this was a successful experience. We succeeded in having those Canadian measures implemented.
Without Canada's participation in that discussion and negotiation, minimum size, gear requirements and fishery closure, which are all based on the best available data.... It is based on data from the previous commercial fishery in the nineties, but it is intended to close an area we believe to be a sensitive one, from a conservation perspective. Contracting parties have agreed on that closure being applied in the NAFO zone, as well.