I need to explain that NAFO itself is an organization made up of 13 contracting parties. NAFO, as an entity, wouldn't have that kind of perspective. It would be a decision taken by the 13 contracting parties.
Indeed, the European Union sought, intersessionally—outside of a regular meeting—to move a motion by email vote to reopen the commercial fishery in NAFO over the course of the summer. Canada was successful in having them withdraw that motion so it could be discussed more completely at the annual meeting.