This leads basically to another question. First and foremost, the aquaculture industry finally woke up to the fact that you and your immediate predecessor were really serious about reforming that whole industry. In the work that's been done since, the new regimes being brought in are quite brave and very definitive, and I believe the west coast thanks you very much for that. But along the way we in this committee particularly took a very very close work at the science being conducted by the DFO. I think the gentlest way of putting it is that there were some gaps in our confidence in that the science being done and presented as evidence for decision-making fell short, particularly when it did come to aquaculture.
I'm wondering if you can give us the latest background on moves to add a little bit more credibility to science at the DFO. I'm concerned, for instance, that some of the studies done were funded by the aquaculture industry, and enlightened self-interest, of course, can worm its way in there. What can you tell us about the state of science at the DFO on the west coast? Are you convinced that they're doing their job?