Thanks. That's a great question.
I can't fully answer it because I don't know what the criteria is for prioritization. I only know that there was some—as loose as it was—by hearing that from my former member of Parliament, Bernadette Jordan, who was, I believe, instrumental in bringing in some of the new changes and regulations for this. She explained at the time why ours were not first on the list. Of course, I thought all of our things should be first on the list, but I understood that there were some others.
However, I don't know what that criteria is, and it is perhaps something that needs to be revisited because, as I said in my opening remarks, at many points, the Cormorant sunk, touched the floor, the seabed. It listed and chemicals were coming out, yet fast-forward and it was still there 10 more years. If that's not on the cusp of an ecological disaster, I don't know. Maybe others were worse.