I think, certainly, for our example there are the two pieces. It was the federal piece of property that was put into private hands with no checks or balances to see what its use was going to be. I'm sure, looking back, whoever made that decision to give it to the Artificial Reef Society.... My understanding is that not only did they give it to the Artificial Reef Society, but they gave them money to maintain it. Therefore, taxpayer money actually funded the creation of this graveyard for ships.
The other component is that two very historically significant Canadian military vessels were given to an organization that had no plan. The Fraser was one of the first Canadian naval ships for female sailors. That's pretty important, yet that history just gets dismissed. If you do a Wikipedia search on that ship, all that history ends with a little line at the bottom, which reads that it was just rotting in Bridgewater. The Cormorant, as I said, recovered the bell from the Edmund Fitzgerald. That's pretty impressive, yet there were no checks or balances.
In terms of some federal regulation, I think there's opportunity for two there. The first is better checks and balances for the divesting of any federal property, wharfs particularly, but also how do we, whether it's a Coast Guard or navy vessel, make sure that whoever takes that on can fund and support whatever future use it has?