I think this goes back to my initial point, which was about the change in 2019 from the goal of protecting fisheries to protecting individual fish. I think the intention should go back to precisely that. From a legal standpoint, I think that would be the simplest step, at this stage. We've provided that as a recommendation in terms of the amendments. This would be really the starting point for this. It would remove the ambiguity we have today.
As I said earlier, we believe this will be absolutely essential if we're going to be able to continue to grow the clean electricity system and get good, clean electricity projects built. This legislation, other pieces of legislation, other regulations—I always see them on a bit of a spectrum. On one end of the spectrum, it's a barrier. On the other end of the spectrum, it's an enabler. If you're lucky, it's somewhere in the middle. Right now, the Fisheries Act is definitely on the side of that spectrum where it is a barrier. It could be an enabler, but it is not. We need to address this.
As I said, I hate coming back six years later and saying that we could have addressed this when we did the legislative change in 2019. I think we need to do it now.