I'll have to interrupt you there because my time is short.
It occurs to me that what we've heard in testimony about DFO science is that—and this is my opinion—it's badly compromised because you get industry funding the science, and it has vetting authority over the results of the science, which really doesn't pass the sniff test with a lot of people. I don't think DFO science, as it's done, has done you any favours in your industry.
I'll go to Mr. Bradley.
I need to give you all of the time I have remaining to explain how you differentiate fisheries from a fish. You can't protect a fishery if you don't protect the fish. Can you just explain the difference that you see there, please?