Thank you very much. I'm sorry to cut you off, but I want to make sure I get many of my questions in. Perhaps if there's any additional information, you could provide it in writing. That would be really helpful.
I'm not 100% sure if this question should go to you, Mr. Henderson, or perhaps Mr. McKay.
I want to get some clarification around the polluter pay principle, to understand more about what this looks like in practice. For example, does this polluter pay principle ensure that likely ecological impacts of the spill are addressed? One example I can think of is styrofoam that is being eaten by fish and birds as it disintegrates—or doesn't disintegrate; it floats in our waters.
Can you speak to how the polluter would be paying for this ecological disaster from styrofoam?