Thank you.
I will follow up on that.
Some of the concerns that have been brought forward were about who is making decisions around what science is made available to the minister and what science is not. That's where the bigger problem seems to come out in that process. That's why, among other things, we are hearing from many witnesses who come to the table seeking an independent, separate committee.
I understand there is some good work happening and that there's an attempt to be more transparent. However, I think that until we move that committee outside and make it independent, we're going to inevitably continue to have these same problems, over and over again.
I'm wondering if you have any suggestions as to how we can embed a more independent process or committee in the act if there were a decision to move forward in that way.