I feel like it's the latter, because if the salmon allocation policy was implemented the way it was written, we wouldn't even need the changes. We just feel like it hasn't been followed, that's all. We're really digging in our heels to try to get some changes that will reflect it and that will maybe create a change in decision-making. Really, the salmon allocation policy in particular is something we're in this policy-changing game for. If you just listened to what the policy said, we'd be fine, so I think it's the latter.
