Who knows? You could even challenge that this is a point of order.
I think the honourable member is litigating the issue. Until we've heard both sides.... He's raised the issue. It would be useful if he went right to what he sees now as the resolution. What would he like to have happen now?
We have witnesses here, at their time and expense, and we would obviously like to get to them. This is not to diminish what the honourable member has brought up, but can we put a bow on this one and get on with the business of the Fisheries Act?