We need to get it closer to the ground so that those closer to the ground have more decision-making authority.
I know on the east coast, Atlantic Canada, there's more stuff under provincial jurisdiction than there is on the west coast. They're often quite emphatic about making sure we understand that jurisdictional distinction. Sometimes there's nothing worse than someone who's further away making decisions that have massive consequences for those living in fishing communities, whose livelihoods are dependent upon fishing.
Based on the input from the harvesters and people in your area, do they feel, under the current construct, that they have direct access or that their concerns are being heard? Do you want to comment a bit on that?