Sure.
I'll give you one quick example. One of the harvesters in our community spoke with Mr. Kelloway on Friday about the fact that right now he's waiting to head out on a halibut fishing trip. Of that catch, 77.5% of the landed value will go to the licence owner, the licence-holder. That's before he can even pay for the cost of his trip and his crew and, hopefully, pay himself.
This fall, the licence-holder has postponed his trip and postponed it and postponed it again. He's waiting at the docks. He can't go fishing because the licence owner is still negotiating for the best deal, which in theory will benefit this harvester somewhat. However, this harvester sits at the dock penniless and unable to go fishing because he doesn't own access to the resource. This is a kind of modern feudal system where he is an indentured worker and has absolutely no agency and no power.
I think it's unthinkable. It's unconscionable that we continue to allow this to happen on the west coast, particularly when we've implemented changes, regulations and laws on the east coast to prevent this from happening in other parts of Canada. Why do we allow this to continue on the west coast?