I wouldn't fully agree. I have a little different opinion on that.
In terms of the oil spill prevention and preparedness, I think we have done a lot in the country. In Canada there are strict regulations under the Canada Shipping Act on the vessels and also in terms of the preparedness with respect to early detection and response. We have a world-class oil spill response facility on the west coast of B.C.
In terms of liability for oil spill response, we have the oil spill liability convention and the ship-source oil pollution fund, to which everyone contributes. In case the liability exceeds the shipowner's insurance, that fund kicks in. Similar to that, in the context of the Zim Kingston, where you have packaged goods and not an oil spill, those things are also covered under the hazardous and noxious substances convention, which Canada was early in adopting and ratifying, and the IMO conventions.
The short answer is that the shipowner is still liable first for addressing all of the environment issues, recovery and repair. When the shipowner's liability is exceeded, then the fund kicks in and provides some additional benefits to the local communities so there is no damage to the environment as a cost, and that is available to everyone.