Thanks, Ms. Fox.
Do any other of the witnesses want to add to that? I'm going to take the silence as a no.
My second question is around the polluter pays principle. I asked a couple of questions in the last block of witnesses last week. We've heard from witnesses that under the Wrecked, Abandoned or Hazardous Vessels Act and the Marine Liability Act, the polluter is liable for losses or damages caused by pollution from a ship.
I'm wondering if you could provide this committee with any further recommendations on how these pieces of legislation, in your view, could protect Canadians from incurring the costs associated with environmental incidents.