I would say first of all that in a situation like that, when we have an ecosystem and large predation like that, there are no easy solutions. I think we have to look at a couple of things. First, to cut harvesters is not the only solution to dealing with these issues. There could have been—and that's why I mentioned the social sciences—some additional consideration given to how we handle these situations, because a lot of people don't believe that there is any rebuilding of shrimp with that many redfish and that kind of a dynamic in the environment. That's one thing.
The other thing we talk about is giving consideration to those who are adjacent to the resource, the people who are impacted by redfish taking over the habitat that the shrimp have, and to not exclude them from that fishery, with people having access to several fisheries and different parts of the ecosystem. Having that diversification in terms of what's in adjacent waters is a plan that can really give some stability at times when we know the environment is really unpredictable. We have highs and lows that oftentimes are not caused by the harvesters themselves.