Perhaps what we could do is carry out the study with the scope as is, and then when it's time to go through the report, try to identify areas where we may be stepping over a boundary and deal with it through edits to the report or whatever, or referral to the transport committee if necessary. I agree with everybody else. This is a worthy study and it's certainly worth looking into. I would hate to see it tossed out as being out of order.
We could maybe do some patches, fixes, hacks or whatever is required at the end of the process to make sure that everything works.