Certainly as far as having an informed decision on the approach to implementing a whalesafe gear program and requirements goes, that is the reason we've been working with industry. We've had almost 100 engagement sessions with the fishing industry. We've funded various research initiatives—weak-rope initiatives, ropeless-gear initiatives and that sort of thing—and certainly all of that information is what we're currently assessing and looking at.
There's no doubt, though, that despite our massive surveillance program, we don't know where each whale is at all times, and certainly that is good reason to make sure that the gear that is in the water is as safe as possible for North Atlantic right whales. As we mentioned, the potential biological removal identified by the U.S. is less than one. We do need to look at these measures, and we'll do so in a manner that is informed by all of the work that we've been doing in recent years with industry so that we can limit the level of unintended consequences.
Certainly we've heard things about the risks of ghost gear and that sort of thing. We are acutely aware of that, and we are assessing all of that information.