I'll say it again. Two UBC studies recently indicated that there's an abundance of chinook when they're in our Canadian waters, yet you closed it anyway. What we're trying to understand is this: We've heard with the testimonies around science that while science is saying there are fish present—sufficient and an abundance of fish for southern resident killer whales—you closed it anyway. We wonder why.
That's what I've asked you. I'm curious. What sets the precedent? Is it the science, because the science clearly said there are enough fish, or is it the ideology of the closure of 30 by 30?