Thank you, Mr. Chair.
The interest we've had in DFO science on the west coast was really driven by the Discovery Islands process, and the advice that was given to the minister that aquaculture in that area posed only a minimal risk. There were questions about the methodology, but there were also questions about material that wasn't included simply because there was no consensus among the players about the conclusions the DFO scientists actually reached. There's a perception that this consensus model, if you can call it that, is contaminating the information that informs decisions. As well, there's also a perception that information in those reports is being somehow massaged by DFO before it gets to the minister.
Can you comment on that?