That is a very good question. I alluded to that in my opening remarks. In some cases, in some regions or in some sectors there is better communication and better exchange of information. There are more examples of the scientists working with the fish harvesters, getting input from them and communicating back to them. The end result of that would be, I hope, better science, better collection of information from fish harvesters and—no doubt—better understanding of the science and, therefore, increased confidence in the science. That needs to occur in all fisheries and in all sectors.
I would say to you that, if I picked one fishery, it probably is best illustrated in the crab fishery in eastern Canada, whether it be gulf region, Maritimes region or the Newfoundland and Labrador region, but in other fisheries it's not as good. That needs to improve.