I'll be interested to hear Dr. Fuller's response to this, because I think she works with harvesters a little bit more.
I'm on some of the technical advisory groups and working groups. I do see a lot of fishing associations, fishermen and others there. There does seem to be input, and more so now than before. I wouldn't say that this was necessarily always the case. There does seem to be quite a bit of input that goes into this. There seems to be broader outreach at the consortium on ropeless gear meetings that are held in Canada.
Certainly when I go to the science advisory meetings in Atlantic Canada, working with fishermen is primary. Again, they're the ones out there. They understand the gear and they're seeing things on the water. I'm not sure if I can make a value judgment about whether it's enough, but I certainly see it being integrated and being listened to.