I just want to respond to Ms. Barron.
My colleagues are tired of me saying this, but I'm a former chair of a committee as well.
This doesn't in any way impede a committee from deciding what its future holds.
The reason we are wanting to make sure that what we had already passed is recognized and respected as such is that we all supported the motions that Mr. Perkins referred to in the schedule. Again, as the chair so eloquently said—I couldn't say it any better—the committee can decide to do whatever it wants in the future. This doesn't impede the committee from making changes if necessary.
It is just kind of a signal that your studies have been heard and they are on the schedule, but again it's always up to the committee to decide what changes it would propose. It doesn't really hamstring us in any way.