Thank you.
I want to add to Mr. Kelloway's and Mr. Hardie's comments, which I heartily agree with. I just want to say that if there was an intention at the beginning to set the calendar for the next two or three years, then I think there would have been a different approach to putting all motions on the table at the time, to be sorted appropriately. I do think committing to a schedule means that in order to have another motion in place that may not be an emergency motion but that may be an important motion, one would then have to change or undo a process.
Respectfully, I think there are other motions being conceived at this time. One motion is very dear to me and to my constituency. I think Canadians expect a collaborative approach. Following what we have set for the next four studies, I believe...and it's great to know these fine studies, and the priority the Conservative Party puts to them, but there are other studies as well to consider in the near future.
So I certainly would not support either the text or the intent of this motion.
Thank you.