Again, in some of the earlier testimony in these hearings, there's quite a difference between what the DFO says it observes—and we presume that there are observations—versus what the fishers say. The fishers, particularly in the more northerly sections of the Gulf of St. Lawrence, are saying there are lots of fish there.
Of course, fishermen are always going to go to where the fish are, so maybe they are getting a warped view of the actual state of the stocks, or maybe they are just seeing something that the DFO isn't.
What do you think?