Thank you, Chair. I'm going to try to talk quickly so that I can get it all in.
Thank you, Minister. I want to follow up on the last question I was asking you about the precautionary principle.
I've heard some rationale that some of the reason we're not getting fish farms out of the water is inconclusive science. That's exactly what the precautionary principle is intended for. When there's inconclusive science, you err on the side of caution. You don't do nothing, which is what we're seeing, but quite the opposite: You remove the potential damage.
Why aren't we seeing the precautionary principle put into place when it comes to open-net fish farms?