We've made a number of attempts over the years to engage different fleets regarding some of the rules that govern their fisheries: marrying, licence stacking.... These provisions vary from one fishery to the next, so it matters which fishery we're talking about. Generally, we have used our engagement and consultation process to implement changes where we have a certain breadth of support for doing so. There are some fisheries in which marrying and stacking are a part of the history of the fishery, but we have changed the way we manage the fishery so that those aren't necessarily measures we need to achieve our conservation objectives. Therefore, we are open to changing them if they provide the fishery with more flexibility.
However, if we don't encounter enough support for making those changes, we have, generally, been sort of reluctant to make changes, because they have financial implications for the harvesters who are participating in those fisheries.