Yes, and again, I think I want to separate the idea of foreign investment from foreign ownership and control of the supply of the fishing access, because I think those are fundamentally two different things and have two different impacts.
I think there are examples and cases of companies in B.C. that have foreign investment or foreign owners, and those companies have been very good participants and partners in the fishery, and good citizens, I'd even say, in the communities in which they have operations. There are also some very difficult examples. It really depends on the model.
What's happening now is that these forms of investment from very large corporate interests are coming in and taking control of the supply and the whole vertical integration of the supply chain. As a result, with the money that gets left in communities, our ability to build on that and even to do some new innovative things with our supply becomes very restricted and limited. I think that is damaging not just for B.C. but anywhere where that continues to exist.
I wouldn't want to say that.... I'm not taking a position here that there's no role for corporations and there's no role for investment or foreign investment, because I think there also have been positive examples of opportunities created out of that. I just think that we need to look at the impact of the policy and what's causing the most damage.