I have heard examples of that, where there is a prescribed maximum percentage of the value of the catch that can go to a licence owner, and I think that would go a long way. I know that, in British Columbia, in many cases, upwards of 75% of the landed value of the catch goes to the licence owner, and what remains isn't enough to have a viable fishing operation.
This is why I say that, under the current system, I understand entirely that fishing is risky, that opening a plant is expensive and that the businesses on the B.C. coast provide a valuable service for all of us who are in the industry by opening plants and by operating off-loading, providing ice and that sort of thing. It's the disproportionate de-risking of those companies in order to make it viable for them at the expense of fishing families that is the problem, so there needs to be a more equitable distribution of the wealth.