Yes. I'll just emphasize that when I raise the idea of a $600-million or a $700-million investment to take public control of the halibut quota, that's not an expenditure. That's setting up an asset that will then generate revenues to pay back the cost of the initial investment. I think it's a transition strategy for how to move it either into permanent community ownership of licences and quota or a government-operated approach, like an arm's-length corporation or a Crown corporation that could provide access to the fishery for people at the community level and so on.
It's not just an expenditure. It's an investment at the front end that gets paid back over time.
I did a similar analysis on the Atlantic lobster fishery. There, you'd be looking at $7 billion to take ownership of the current licences at current average prices. It's a different scale of enterprise altogether.