Thank you.
I guess my next question has to do with the money.
DFO seems to be suggesting by its actions that it has every right to decide how the commission's dollars are spent because of the perception, for lack of a better word, of it being the portfolio manager. Is it accountable for the commission? Would you agree that you would be the portfolio manager?
With the way the money is flowing, or has flowed in the past, would you agree that's the way it should flow, or, moving forward, as per direction from the appropriations of Parliament, would it simply be, under the MOA, a flow-through, through DFO to the GLFC—five years with $19 million? Then, as I said earlier, it would go back through the invoice, which DFO would actually provide for the services provided to GLFC, and GLFC would simply be expected to pay the invoice with respect to the $19 million they will receive through the appropriations.