Mr. Chair, I will ask the next question and see if the minister can answer this one.
The original fish harvesters benefit lined up nine stages to application. The first step was to identify which of the following situations in 2020 were the “most applicable” to their situation. Since you haven't read it, I thought I'd read it to you.
In outlining the five scenarios, the application did not say “self-employed and one other”. It listed five options. Option three was, “Shareperson who is a crew member, who earns a share of the revenue.” It does not say “self-employed shareperson”. It does not say “or”. You keep misleading the House when you say that it was both.
Yes or no, do you agree that the original application process said “shareperson” only and that you and your department have confused thousands of fishermen in how you interpreted it afterwards?