Certain laws around food, social and ceremonial are clear. Where things really start to get murky is when you talk about “moderate livelihood”. When we talk about moderate livelihood fisheries, what are those? We don't even know what a moderate livelihood is, let alone what that fishery may consist of. Even when you look at that part of that decision, the decision was the right to the pursuit of a moderate livelihood. It was no guarantee of a moderate livelihood.
Where the lack of clarity exists, I think anywhere the government can take the time to clear something up, even one small issue at a time, that will help. It's in the grey. Conflict is more likely to exist when there's confusion.