I'll cover that in a brief manner and reference my answer to Member Barron's question earlier.
Not only do we need good data for the substantive decisions about sustainability of the fisheries, but we need good data so that there's buy-in from the communities and the regulated industry in terms of confidence in the decisions that are being made that affect their livelihoods. There are two benefits: Better data means better decisions and better support for those decisions.
I would like to see as a starting point the prompt implementation of all of the recommendations from this report, plus those in our previous report from 2016.
Would that be enough? No, it wouldn't, because this report is about monitoring fish catch. There's the science aspect as well as the enforcement aspect, which are out of the scope for this particular audit. We would need to see improvements in those areas as well, so that the department has what it needs to sustain the fisheries and the communities have what they need to be confident in those decisions about sustainability.