Totally.
I wanted to reflect on my evil twin on X over here and the comment he made about the growth in the human resources department at the DFO. I have a theory that the health and effectiveness of any organization is inversely related to the number of people in HR. I'll let him just think on that one.
I want to talk about exhibit 9.2 in your report. There are five steps for “Implementing the Fishery Monitoring Policy”: “prioritize fisheries”, “assess current fishery program”, “set conservation and compliance monitoring objectives”, “identify monitoring requirements” and “develop and operationalize a fishery monitoring program”, so at step five we actually get to do something. Then step six is “review monitoring program performance”.
Mr. Williams or Mr. Napier, one of you can answer yes or no. Is this really what the DFO accepts as the proper approach?