I think the point earlier with my comment was that it's not necessarily a hard science in terms of what my colleagues do when establishing a total allowable catch. The science, if anything, is a social science. It's a policy question in which various considerations have to be taken into account.
In that respect, there are a number of things we did to ensure that we had some level of transparency. This was a wide-ranging consultation that took over two years. We produced “What we heard” documents in terms of the information that we collected. We heard from almost every group in terms of what they wished to be their share. Simply, it wouldn't work mathematically if we were to say yes to everything. In terms of where we landed, we tried to balance all of those considerations. That's the allocation key that we have.